Reclaiming Agency: Subverting Patriarchy and Reconfiguring Gender in Enola Holmes (2020)

Authors

  • Felicia Celine Saputra MAKARIOS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Imanuela Kimberly Rumondor MAKARIOS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL

Keywords:

Feminism, Gender Roles, Patriarchy, Female Empowerment, Enola Holmes

Abstract

In the 21st century, feminism continues to grapple with persistent challenges, including gender pay gaps, underrepresentation in leadership roles, and ongoing debates over reproductive rights that echo historical struggles for equality. Drawing connections to feminist protests during the Victorian era. Using a qualitative method, this study employed feminist theory, particularly the works of Judith Butler (1990), Betty Friedan (1963), and Charlotte Brontë (1847) to analyze the 2020 film Enola Holmes. The film is examined as a cultural text that subverts patriarchal norms and offers a narrative of female empowerment by: 1) presenting characters, such as Enola and her mother, Eudoria, who reject conventional feminine behavior in favor of self-defense, independence, and intellectual curiosity;    2) critiquing institutional constraints through the depiction of rigid gender stereotypes enforced by settings like the finishing school; and 3) illustrating how Enola’s defiance of familial and societal expectations empowers her to reclaim agency and reshape her future. This article contributes to ongoing academic discourse on gender representation in media by demonstrating how modern adaptations of historical settings can illuminate contemporary feminist issues and challenge established societal norms regarding gender equality.

References

Brontë, C. (1847). Jane Eyre. Smith, Elder & Co.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of "sex". Routledge.

Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. W. W. Norton & Company.

Friedan, B. (1976). It changed my life: Writings on the women's movement. Random House.

Gilbert, S. M., & Gubar, S. (1979). The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. Yale University Press.

Gissing, G. (1893). The odd women. London: Lawrence & Bullen, 16 Henrietta Street, Covent Garden, W.C.

Heilmann, A., & Llewellyn, M. (2004). Neo-Victorianism: The Victorians in the Twenty-First Century, 1999-2009. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hooks, b. (2000). Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics. Pluto Press.

Landrine, H., Russo, N. F. (2009) Handbook of Diversity in Feminist Psychology. New York, Springer Publishing Company.

Lauzen, M. M. (2021). It's a Man's (Celluloid) World: Portrayals of Female Characters in the Top Grossing Films of 2020. Center for the Study of Women in Television and Film.

Showalter, E. (1977). A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Brontë to Lessing. Princeton University Press.

Showalter, E. (1991). Feminist criticism in the wilderness. Routledge.

Solnit, Rebecca. Men Explain Things to Me. Chicago: Haymarket Books, 2014. Print.

Tong, R. (2009). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction (2nd ed.). Westview Press.

Cover

Downloads

Published

2025-02-28

How to Cite

Saputra, F. C., & Rumondor, I. K. (2025). Reclaiming Agency: Subverting Patriarchy and Reconfiguring Gender in Enola Holmes (2020). Boanerges: Makarios Education Journal, 2(2), 140–149. Retrieved from https://streamfly.tech/index.php/boanerges/article/view/31

Issue

Section

Table of Contents

Most read articles by the same author(s)