Redefining Feminine Strength and Vulnerability: A Gender Performative Analysis of Wonder Woman 1984 (2020) Movie

Authors

  • Jesslyn Quaneisha Lie MAKARIOS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Nathanael Raditya Putra Satriyo MAKARIOS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Gabriel Andrea Ricky MAKARIOS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Caesar Allie Sihaloho MAKARIOS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL

Keywords:

Wonder Woman (1984), Feminism, Gender Performativity, Patriarchy, Gender Roles

Abstract

This study investigates the critical issue in Wonder Woman (1984) in feminist perspective, by using Judith Butler’s (1990) theory of gender performativity. The movie explores the interconnectedness of feminine strength and vulnerability, traditional gender roles, and the theme of power and agency. Diana Prince’s journey reflects the societal pressure on women to embody both strength and emotional complexity, while Barbara Minerva’s transformation into Cheetah represents the internalization of masculine ideals of power. As the results: 1) The movie demonstrates that feminine strength and vulnerability can coexist, subverting the notion that power must align solely with masculine ideals. 2) Wonder Woman (1984) critiques traditional gender roles by showing how women’s autonomy is often constrained by societal expectations, particularly in relationships and social responsibilities. 3) The movie reveals a significant difference in how power and agency are explored between male and female characters, with male characters like Max Lord wielding unchecked power, while female characters must navigate moral and societal limitations. Through Butler’s framework, Wonder Woman 1984 critiques traditional gender norms, suggesting that true empowerment comes from redefining power and success beyond patriarchal structures. This article is expected to enhance feminist discourse in movie analysis by offering a more profound insight into how media portrayals of women both challenge and uphold societal standards. Hence, it enhances critical conversations around gender, power, and identity, encouraging further exploration of how movies can influence and reflect progressing perspectives on gender equality.

References

Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. Routledge.

Beauvoir, S. (1949). The Second Sex. Gallimard.

Berger, J. (1972). Ways of Seeing. Penguin.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.

Butler, J. (1993). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of "Sex". Routledge.

Eagleton, T. (2008). Literary Theory: An Introduction. University of Minnesota Press.

Firestone, S. (1970). The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. William Morrow and Company.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Harvard University Press.

Hooks, B. (1984). Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. South End Press.

Hutcheon, L. (2013). A Theory of Adaptation (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Internet Movie Database. (n.d.). IMDb. IMDb.com, Inc. Retrieved August 29, 2024, from https://www.imdb.com/

Jenkins, P. (Director). (2020). Wonder Woman 1984 [Film]. Warner Bros. Pictures.

Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6-18.

Rich, A. (1976). Of Woman Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution. Norton.

Smith, J. (2023). Gender Representation in Superhero films: A Contemporary Feminist Analysis. The Journal of Gender and Media Studies.

Cover

Downloads

Published

2024-08-29

How to Cite

Lie, J. Q., Satriyo, N. R. P., Ricky, G. A., & Sihaloho, C. A. (2024). Redefining Feminine Strength and Vulnerability: A Gender Performative Analysis of Wonder Woman 1984 (2020) Movie. Boanerges: Makarios Education Journal, 2(1), 87–95. Retrieved from https://streamfly.tech/index.php/boanerges/article/view/26

Issue

Section

Table of Contents

Most read articles by the same author(s)